Were You Listening?

“A play presents a self-enclosed little world for the audience to examine.  It’s an opportunity to look objectively at a group of people, to assess them, to react to them, and to measure oneself against them, to ask “Am I like that?”  Every playwright tries to present on stage–in the world he creates–something like an aspect of his own view of the real world, the world outside the play, and I find the real world to be disturbingly complicated and hard to figure out.”   –Wallace Shawn

So.  Perhaps you have been mulling over “Aunt Dan & Lemon” on your commute home from the Chopin.  Perhaps you are angry.  Perhaps you are exhilarated.  Perhaps you are confused.  Perhaps you are ambivalent.  All of these responses have deep merit.  In fact, any response at all, whether positive or negative that you may have had to this deceptive, unnerving little play speaks to what this play is ultimately about.

You.

I find Aunt Dan and Lemon to be a fascinating, infuriating play which at various times appears to be about the subversive power of influence and ideology, about the devastating impact of politics on a family, of our country’s voyeuristic fascination with violence and sex and force.  But ultimately Aunt Dan and Lemon is a play about its audience.  It is about what happens inside the imaginations, the hearts, the emotional cores and the political consciousness of the audience.  The play asks its audience to listen carefully and deeply and to make sense of the play’s lingering questions for themselves.

To me, this is a unique and increasingly latent power of the theatre.  To intimately engage the audience with mystery and nuance; to take them by surprise; to treat them as intelligent, discerning individuals; to present an audience with big questions and send them back into the world with something to consider.  Something to work on.

Some audience members may have a hard time believing that a playwright could create a character such as Lemon, and ask her to say the things she says for as long as she says them and with as much intellectual clarity as she does, without in turn believing that the playwright is espousing his own political viewpoints, and attempting to foist them upon us.  But this particular play is less an examination of a specific political stance, and more an examination of the ways that dangerous ideas are communicated through families, communities and through the mass media.  By continuously asking “are you listening?” this play asks its audience to do an enormous amount of work, and truthfully, contemporary American audiences are no longer acquainted to that kind of experience.  The proliferation of instant mass media, including 24 hour cable channels and radio talk shows and internet blogs have led to our society becoming accustomed to others doing our listening for us, and telling us how to feel before we’ve had a chance to sort it out for ourselves.  Everything is filtered through something or someone else.  The great brilliance in this strange play is that there is no filter.  Lemon addresses us, the audience, directly.  There is no summarizing headline, no excerpt, no analysis, no counter-commentary, no rebuttal.  Lemon seduces us, she charms us and then she talks to us.  For a very, very long time.  And there is nothing, no one to instruct us how to feel about the things she says.  We must work that out for ourselves.

So, a play that challenges its audience to listen, to experience and to evaluate needs a followup discussion.  We at BackStage Theatre Company would love to engage you in a conversation about your experience of this particular story.  Please use the comment section below to begin the conversation.  We eagerly look forward to talking to you.

After you have shared your own personal thoughts about Lemon & her story, I recommend heading over to this page, where playwright Wallace Shawn shares what he calls “A Justification On Putting The Audience Through a Difficult Evening.”  Like this play and his new book of Essays, this is fascinating reading.

We’re glad you came.  Let’s talk.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Were You Listening?”

  1. Matt M. says:

    Greatly enjoyed this fine production of a brilliant, maddening, and often downright clunky play.

    For me the play really asks some good questions about the seductive nature of authority and force.
    I was reminded of Stanley Milgram’s social experiments in the late 60′s–a great companion read to this play if you haven’t read his work. Milgram created an experiment that resembles real-life incidents in which people see themselves as merely cogs in a wheel, just “doing their job”, allowing them to avoid responsibility for the consequences of their actions….much like the Nazis detailed in Lemon’s stories. Fascinating and scary stuff.

    Kudos to the cast and crew.

  2. Matt,

    Thanks for stopping by! And thanks for coming to the show.

    We actually did talk quite extensively about the Milgram experiments in our table work. Truly disturbing and underappreciated aspect of human nature, to be sure. What are we willing to do to preserve our own way of life? And what stops us from doing horrible things to other human beings (as the Milgram experiments demonstrate) if we have been relieved of all consequences? Is it compassion alone? Does that kind of compassion really exist? Lemon is skeptical. I’d like to think it does, but the outcome of the Milgram experiments make it extremely difficult to hold on to that belief with any real integrity.

    For those interested, here is a bit of our research. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=5512184

    Thanks Matt!

  3. RebeccaZ says:

    I saw the show last night from a seat that didn’t allow me to see everything. In fact, any staging that was on the bed was invisible to me so I was forced to listen. I didn’t mind that one bit and mentioned to Brenda B. after the show, that it provided an unusual and unique experience that no one else had … unless they had sat in my seat and, even then, their show would have been different from my show because I brought my own background, ideas, thoughts, etc to the table while Lemon shared her perspective and stories with us.

    I am planning on purchasing Aunt Dan and Lemon as soon as I can because I’ve been thining about the show so much today. It’s such a “grey” piece so, of course, I loved it. The subversive nature of the characters, the wide-eyed, innocent look of Lemon as she listened and imagined Dan’s stories, the passion of living on a side with the layers peeled back that others might not want to see … all of that is right up my alley. As a mother, I wanted to cover Lemon’s eyes and remove her from her isolation, but I also thought … what will I do to subvert my own daughter without even knowing? How was my imagination “corrupted?” My family thought VC Andrews were kid’s stories and didn’t know that I had Cujo in my sixth grade desk at school. They knew I really loved the movie Psycho when I was 12 but didn’t know how much I thought about it. I talked to my husband about the show this morning and he mentioned that, when he was 11, he loved going over to his friend’s house where his friend’s dad would share his cigarettes and talk about Nazis and would let the boys watch horror movies that his folks would be shocked about. He said he loved that guy.

    I could probably go on and on about the play right now and may very well take Lemon’s offer up on the opposite side of the postcard passed out at the end of the show if I get a chance. I’ll make sure to pick another seat with another viewpoint.

    Thanks, Backstage, for a fascinating production.

Leave a Reply