As the holidays approach, our 12th season officially gets underway! Our first production, A Number, opens on January 7th at the Building Stage. In anticipation of the opening of the BackStage Season, Development Director Celene Mielcarek sat down for a conversation with Artistic Director Matthew Reeder about what is in store for BackStage in the New Year and beyond.
As Artistic Director, what are you most looking forward to in BackStage’s 2011-2012 Season?
There’s an awful lot to be excited about this season. We’ve two wonderful, challenging plays that we are incredibly excited about. ”A Scent of Flowers,” is a wonderfully poetic drama that was written in 1965, but feels like it could have been written last week. James Saunders, the playwright, is virtually unknown in the States, but Tom Stoppard claims that it was watching Saunder’s “Next Time I’ll Sing For You” that made him want to write plays. We’ve done a lot of digging, and we can’t find a production history for “Scent of Flowers,” but we think that our production is one of the first professional productions of this remarkable play in the States. And it fits our mission like a glove. It feels like a real find. It’s an ambitious piece. I’ve been quietly sitting on this play for a few seasons, and I think we’re ready.
Also, I am very excited about “A Number.” I think that Caryl Churchill is one of the most unique dramatic voices of our time and in “A Number,” she has penned a really haunting story that examines the complex bonds of fathers and sons within the confines of a naturalistic sci-fi chamber drama. I know, it sounds bizarre! But the strangest thing about the play is how un-strange it actually is. The play is (like most of the stories we tell) deeply intimate and full of questions. And it is being directed by my good friend and mentor Karen Kessler, who is a company member at Red Orchid. Karen is the former Artistic Director of Famous Door Theatre company, where I served as an MFA intern many years ago. She helped me launch my career here in Chicago, and I can’t wait to have her around this season. It feel like a circle has completed itself somehow. And she’s a really exciting director.
What was BackStage’s greatest impact last season?
Last season was pretty significant for us on a number of levels. With Memory, we took a challenging, relatively untested play about a contentious subject and turned it into one of our most notable productions. Mostly importantly, however, that experience gave us a several new opportunities to engage our growing family of patrons in a vital dialogue about the kinds of stories we choose to tell, and how those stories affect our lives. Our Sunday talkback series gave us a weekly opportunity to connect to our patrons in a very direct, approachable way. In the process, we have begun to get to know the people who have come to know our stories. A lot of artists spend a majority of their creative lives shouting into the void. It is a remarkable thing when that void begins to light up with familiar faces.
BackStage is in a period of exciting change right now! What are some of the changes you are most excited about?
We have been in the process of rejuvenating our staff for quite some time now. Just three years ago, we had a staff of just four. There are now ten of us. Over this past summer we have added a new Development Director, a new Associate Artistic Director and we a new Managing Director. In the past few seasons, we have seen wonderful growth on the board level. Three seasons ago, there were two people on the board. Now we have a full and very active, enthusiastic board of seven who have brought more to this organization than I could possibly describe in the few minutes that I have here.
Organizational development may not be the sexiest thing to talk about, but the people really are the lifeblood of an organization. Adding this many talented, driven people to the BSTC roster bodes pretty well for the future of the organization. These folks will only continue to make us get better at what we do. That’s pretty exciting to me.
What makes BackStage different from other storefront Chicago theatres?
Even though we are a small organization, we are already decidedly mission-driven. Every decision we make, whether about programming or otherwise, is filtered through the lens of our organizational mission and our core values. This is a clarifying process, but it doesn’t always make it easier. The dedication to our mission gives us less room for easy decisions, and makes programming a season much more focused and particular. It adds creative tension to the selection of a season but it has, I think, always ended up paying off in a pretty meaningful way. Our mission is a pretty unique one, and we are learning how to navigate through the questions it asks of us.
Also, we are a direct product of the Chicago theatre scene, and very specifically the homegrown Storefront movement. Much of what we do has been dictated by the realities of the “alternative spaces” we have produced in over the years. These spaces vary in functionality and quality, but one common characteristic among them is their proximity to the audience. For a long time, theatre companies like ours were looked upon as the little companies who were still waiting to grow up. The local mythology of Steppenwolf has spawned a million like-minded start-up theatre companies who have long believed that the incredible combination of factors that lead to Steppenwolf’s unprecedented success can happen to them if they just stick it out long enough. For a few decades now, Storefront theatres have been pointing at that famous Steppenwolf marquis and asking “how do we get there?”
At BackStage, we are asking ourselves a different set of questions. Over the past few seasons, we have become increasingly enlivened by the possibilities that exist in the constraints of our intimate spaces. In these small spaces, fueled by the questions that our mission compels us to ask, we have realized that we are already offering our audiences something vital and unique. Staged in close proximity to the audience, our stories become something our audiences experience, rather than watch. Combine that disarming closeness with our dedication to producing shows that require some imaginative and intellectual work on the part of our audiences, and a picture begins to emerge that really has nothing to do with becoming the next “big” thing. Our central question then becomes less about how we might land our 500 seat theatre, and more about how to deepen our close engagement with our audiences as we grow. These are somewhat uncharted waters, but they are very very exciting to us.